Re: [isabelle] proofterm bug?
Sean McLaughlin wrote:
(thm \cdot TYPE ...
normally theorem applications are labeled by name
This theorem seems to be unnamed, and is a mystery to me.
such unnamed theorems usually appear when intermediate results
in packages (like the datatype package) or simplification procedures
are proved via prove_goalw_cterm (now replaced by Goal.prove in the
development version) and similar functions. Since these theorems are
not stored in the theorem database, they do not get a name.
To unfold such unnamed theorems in a proof term, you can apply the
Reconstruct.expand_proof <theory> [("", NONE)] <proof>
Dr. Stefan Berghofer E-Mail: berghofe at in.tum.de
Institut fuer Informatik Phone: +49 89 289 17328
Technische Universitaet Muenchen Fax: +49 89 289 17307
Boltzmannstr. 3 Room: 01.11.059
85748 Garching, GERMANY http://www.in.tum.de/~berghofe
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail (Mailman edition) and