Re: [isabelle] x-symbols and AFS?

On Sat, 03 Jul 2010 00:03:48 Makarius wrote:
> The reason why ancient xemacs is needed on Cygwin is the lack
> of GNU Emacs 22 on that platform.  ProofGeneral-3.7.x does not
> work with the newer GNU Emacs 23 line, which is generally far
> superior.

I use Proof General with GNU Emacs 23.2.1, but I'm working 
with Linux (and NetBSD on another computer, with perhaps a 
different release of Emacs 23), not Cygwin.  I find it usable 
(with Unicode tokens, not X-Symbol), but not perfect.  For 
details, see my post at and David 
Aspinall's commendably concise summary in his reply.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

This archive was generated by a fusion of Pipermail (Mailman edition) and MHonArc.