*To*: isabelle-users at cl.cam.ac.uk*Subject*: [isabelle] Confusing behavior of a paired set comprehension*From*: Giuliano Losa <giuliano.losa at epfl.ch>*Date*: Wed, 4 Apr 2012 11:11:37 +0200

Hello, the following definition is interpreted in a confusing way: def ident :: "'a set => ('a \times 'a) set" where "ident S = {(x,x) . x \in S}" the command "thm ident_def" yields ident ?S \<equiv> {(xa, x). x \<in> ?S} Should this be considered as a bug? Giuliano

**Follow-Ups**:**Re: [isabelle] Confusing behavior of a paired set comprehension***From:*Tobias Nipkow

**Re: [isabelle] Confusing behavior of a paired set comprehension***From:*Ramana Kumar

**Re: [isabelle] Confusing behavior of a paired set comprehension***From:*Brian Huffman

- Previous by Date: [isabelle] Receiving error by importing theory file Sum_Of_Squares
- Next by Date: Re: [isabelle] Confusing behavior of a paired set comprehension
- Previous by Thread: Re: [isabelle] Receiving error by importing theory file Sum_Of_Squares
- Next by Thread: Re: [isabelle] Confusing behavior of a paired set comprehension
- Cl-isabelle-users April 2012 archives indexes sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ date ]
- Cl-isabelle-users list archive Table of Contents
- More information about the Cl-isabelle-users mailing list