Re: [isabelle] proving existentially quantified statements using 'obtain'ed witness fails

Hi Julian,

a further comment:

> theorem "EX x. x = (0 :: nat)"
> proof

the statement to prove here contains a schematic variable ?x or such.
This is something better to be avoided except for good reason.



PGP available:

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

This archive was generated by a fusion of Pipermail (Mailman edition) and MHonArc.