Re: [isabelle] proving existentially quantified statements using 'obtain'ed witness fails



Hi Julian,

a further comment:

> theorem "EX x. x = (0 :: nat)"
> proof

the statement to prove here contains a schematic variable ?x or such.
This is something better to be avoided except for good reason.

Cheers,
	Florian

-- 

PGP available:
http://home.informatik.tu-muenchen.de/haftmann/pgp/florian_haftmann_at_informatik_tu_muenchen_de

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature



This archive was generated by a fusion of Pipermail (Mailman edition) and MHonArc.