*To*: René Neumann <rene.neumann at in.tum.de>*Subject*: Re: [isabelle] Implicit structure argument*From*: Makarius <makarius at sketis.net>*Date*: Tue, 2 Apr 2013 17:19:19 +0200 (CEST)*Cc*: Isabelle Users <isabelle-users at cl.cam.ac.uk>*In-reply-to*: <515AF3A1.8090101@in.tum.de>*References*: <5141CED2.8060709@in.tum.de> <alpine.LNX.2.00.1304021652230.20572@macbroy21.informatik.tu-muenchen.de> <515AF3A1.8090101@in.tum.de>*User-agent*: Alpine 2.00 (LNX 1167 2008-08-23)

On Tue, 2 Apr 2013, René Neumann wrote:

Section 7.3: notation goes with a 'struct_mixfix'. (Ironically, thenonterminal 'fixes' (p. 82) does not support "(structure)" according tothe diagram given).

I can't say on the spot if it is feasible to make implicit structuresmore general -- they have been a bit on retreat in recent years, andare now a bit old-fashioned anyway.But there is no replacement, is there?

Makarius

**References**:**Re: [isabelle] Implicit structure argument***From:*Makarius

**Re: [isabelle] Implicit structure argument***From:*René Neumann

- Previous by Date: Re: [isabelle] Implicit structure argument
- Next by Date: Re: [isabelle] SELECT_GOAL and schematic variables
- Previous by Thread: Re: [isabelle] Implicit structure argument
- Next by Thread: Re: [isabelle] SELECT_GOAL and schematic variables
- Cl-isabelle-users April 2013 archives indexes sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ date ]
- Cl-isabelle-users list archive Table of Contents
- More information about the Cl-isabelle-users mailing list