*To*: René Thiemann <rene.thiemann at uibk.ac.at>*Subject*: Re: [isabelle] No tail-recursive code equation for List.map*From*: Brian Huffman <huffman at in.tum.de>*Date*: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 10:13:31 -0700*Cc*: "C. Diekmann" <diekmann at in.tum.de>, "cl-isabelle-users at lists.cam.ac.uk" <cl-isabelle-users at lists.cam.ac.uk>*In-reply-to*: <F42C9D80-06F3-499B-8F0E-5005A2362BC8@uibk.ac.at>*References*: <CAGbqCMz-55E56FmnaRtdCGfaiuUUmn_8uMLS0-YDjgNh6cQQ6g@mail.gmail.com> <F42C9D80-06F3-499B-8F0E-5005A2362BC8@uibk.ac.at>

On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 6:50 AM, René Thiemann <rene.thiemann at uibk.ac.at> wrote: > So, if there will be a tail-recursive code equation for List.map in > the default library, please only activate it on languages which > really profit from tail-recursion. I remember having a similar thought when I saw the changeset "tail recursive code for function upto" a while back. http://isabelle.in.tum.de/repos/isabelle/rev/a019e013b7e4 The original (non-tail recursive) code would be preferred when generating Haskell. - Brian

**References**:**[isabelle] No tail-recursive code equation for List.map***From:*C. Diekmann

**Re: [isabelle] No tail-recursive code equation for List.map***From:*René Thiemann

- Previous by Date: Re: [isabelle] No tail-recursive code equation for List.map
- Next by Date: Re: [isabelle] No tail-recursive code equation for List.map
- Previous by Thread: Re: [isabelle] No tail-recursive code equation for List.map
- Next by Thread: [isabelle] Last CfP CSASC "proving in education"
- Cl-isabelle-users April 2013 archives indexes sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ date ]
- Cl-isabelle-users list archive Table of Contents
- More information about the Cl-isabelle-users mailing list