Re: [isabelle] Isabelle2016-RC2 panel focus issues
OK, I just re-tried Isabelle2015 and the behavior seems to be the same
(though I don't like it). I apologize for "shooting from the lip" and
costing you the time and effort. Basically when I downloaded and started
using Isabelle2016-RC2 I somehow became aware very quickly of this behavior,
which had not bothered me before, so I presumed that it was new.
Apparently it is not.
- Gene Stark
On 01/29/2016 06:11 PM, Makarius wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Jan 2016, Eugene W. Stark wrote:
>> Ubuntu 14.04 LTS, using Unity. I can dig up the precise settings,
>> if you tell me what you want and where to look for it among the
>> various settings, "tweak tools", and configuration files.
>> - Gene Stark
>> On 01/29/2016 09:57 AM, Makarius wrote:
>>> On Fri, 29 Jan 2016, Eugene W. Stark wrote:
>>>> Isabelle2016-RC2 has a new (and annoying) behavior that I don't believe
>>>> I have noticed in previous versions. Under Ubuntu, I have the window manager
>>>> set to "focus follows mouse". But JEdit no longer honors this, in the situation
>>>> where I click in the Sidekick panel, then move the mouse to the main edit
>>>> window, the focus remains in the Sidekick panel and if I start to type my
>>>> typein goes into the Sidekick filter textbox. To be able to type in the
>>>> main window, I have to explicitly click on it to change the focus.
>>> Which version of Ubuntu is this precisely? An which window manager?
> I have now installed Ubuntu 14.04 LTS with Unity and Unity Tweak Tool to enable "Mouse" focus.
> It basically appears to work as I would expect, both in Isabelle2015 and Isabelle2016-RC2, when moving between the outer
> windows (called "frames" in Java terminology). Within a window, focus follows clicks as usual in Swing, but there are
> slight differences demending on the look-and-feel, e.g. highlighting of buttons as the mouse moves.
> I don't think that Java Swing actually supports focus follows mouse *within* its own windows. In which combination of
> versions and look-and-feels did you see this working?
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail (Mailman edition) and