Re: [isabelle] A tautological error?
Iâm afraid your question is off topic for this mailing list. Please ask questions directly connected with Isabelle. There are plenty of forums where you can discuss the philosophy of mathematics.
> On 11 Jul 2016, at 13:40, Andreas RÃhler <andreas.roehler at easy-emacs.de> wrote:
> Hi all,
> the Russel's Paradox constitutes a surprise:
> Doesn't it ignore the Subject-Object-Relation of all statement?No definition might define it's own definition. As someone upheld a recursive function here: Any recursive function must be defined before calling it, the recursion is no defining-process, it comes afterwards.
> Kind of a tautological error?
> As far as Cantor is the guilty, well, Russell should have rejected Cantors exaggeration...
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail (Mailman edition) and