Re: [isabelle] Lifting package and state transformers

Hi Andreas,

Cant you just define an abbreviation âliftâ, and define foo_state = lift foo ?


-------- Originalnachricht --------
Betreff: [isabelle] Lifting package and state transformers
Von: Andreas Lochbihler
An: isabelle-users

Dear experts of the lifting package,

I wonder whether I can automate certain liftings with the Lifting package. Concretely,
suppose I have a function foo and I want to lift it to a type of state transformers:

datatype ('s, 'm) stateT = StateT (run_state: "'s => 'm")
context fixes foo :: "('a => 'm) => 'm" begin
definition foo_state :: "('a => ('s, 'm) stateT) => ('s, 'm) stateT"
where "foo_state f = StateT (%s. foo (%a. run_state (f a) s))"

Can I (somehow) use lift_definition to define foo_state? I am thinking of something like
the following:

setup_lifting ...
lift_definition foo_state :: "('a => ('s, 'm) stateT) => ('s, 'm) stateT" is foo

Unfortunately, I have no idea what theorem provide to setup_lifting to make this work. I
tried with the obvious one

type_definition run_state StateT UNIV

but that did not work. Any ideas?


This archive was generated by a fusion of Pipermail (Mailman edition) and MHonArc.