# Re: [isabelle] Generalized version of wf_map_prod_image

```A generalized version of the thm due to Andrei Popescu is in now:

http://isabelle.in.tum.de/repos/isabelle/rev/80df7c90e315

Thanks to both of you.
Tobias

On 20/05/2018 12:12, Kasper F. Brandt wrote:
```
```Hello list
I wrote this generalization of wf_map_prod_image that only requires the
mapping to be injective on the the subset present in the relation.

lemma wf_map_prod_image':
fixes r:: "('a × 'a) set"
and f:: "'a ⇒ 'b"
assumes wf_r: "wf r"
and inj: "inj_on f (fst ` r ∪ snd ` r)"
shows "wf (map_prod f f ` r)"
unfolding wf_eq_minimal
proof (clarify)
fix Q::"'b set"
and x::"'b"
assume x_mem: "x ∈ Q"
let "?Q'" = "{p. f p ∈ Q ∧ p ∈ (fst ` r ∪ snd ` r)}"

show "∃z∈Q. ∀y. (y, z) ∈ map_prod f f ` r ⟶ y ∉ Q"
proof (rule case_split)
assume ex_fp_Q: "∃p. f p ∈ Q ∧ p ∈ (fst ` r ∪ snd ` r)"
obtain z0 where z0_mem: "z0∈?Q'" and *: "∀y. (y, z0) ∈ r ⟶ y ∉ ?Q'"
using ex_fp_Q wf_r[unfolded wf_eq_minimal, rule_format, of _ ?Q'] by
blast
have **: "⋀y z. (y,z) ∈ r ⟹ y ∈ (fst ` r ∪ snd ` r) ∧ z ∈ (fst ` r ∪
snd ` r) "
by (metis Domain.intros Domain_fst Range.RangeI Range_snd Un_iff)
have "∀y. (y, f z0) ∈ map_prod f f ` r ⟶ y ∉ Q"
proof (intro allI impI)
fix y
assume "(y, f z0) ∈ map_prod f f ` r"
then obtain y' and ya where y'_ya_def: "(y, f z0) = (f y', f ya)"
and y'_ya_rel: "(y', ya) ∈ r"
using prod_fun_imageE by blast
have "f z0 ∈ Q ∧ z0 ∈ fst ` r ∪ snd ` r"
using z0_mem by blast
moreover have "f y' = y ∧ f ya = f z0"
using y'_ya_def by fastforce
ultimately have "ya = z0"
using "**" y'_ya_rel inj inj_onD by metis
then show "y ∉ Q"
using "*" "**" Pair_inject y'_ya_def y'_ya_rel by blast
qed
then show "∃z∈Q. ∀y. (y, z) ∈ map_prod f f ` r ⟶ y ∉ Q"
using z0_mem by blast
next
assume not_ex_fp_Q: "∄p. f p ∈ Q ∧ p ∈ (fst ` r ∪ snd ` r)"
then have "⋀p . f p ∈ Q ⟹ p ∉ fst ` r ∧ p ∉ snd ` r"
by blast
then have "⋀z y. z ∈ Q ⟹ (y, z) ∉ map_prod f f ` r"
by force
then show ?thesis using x_mem by auto
qed
qed

Would it make sense to add this to Wellfounded.thy, or replace the existing
one? I'll note that this should follow from wf_map_prod_image by defining a
type from the subset present in the relation, but I don't know Isabelle
well enough to know how easy it is to prove this version from it. If
nothing else this version is written in Isar style while  wf_map_prod_image is
currently in apply-script style (I haven't checked Isabelle 2018)

- Kasper Fabæch Brandt

```
```
```

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

This archive was generated by a fusion of Pipermail (Mailman edition) and MHonArc.