Re: [isabelle] Isabelle2019-RC0: Improved "Isabelle DejaVu" font collection, suitable for text and GUI
Maybe this problem is not related to the font. Please take a look at my
I made it on Windows 10 with font scaling set to 125% on the system level.
As you can see icons are big and blurry in Isabelle HOL 2019. Also the font
size is larger.
I guess that it looks blurry because of broken font scaling or dpi settings.
Maybe Isabelle_01-Apr-2019.exe.manifest file is ignored.
сб, 6 апр. 2019 г. в 01:55, Makarius <makarius at sketis.net>:
> Dear Isabelle users,
> the Isabelle2019-RC0/ANNOUNCE file says:
> * Improved "Isabelle DejaVu" font collection, suitable for text and GUI.
> * Update to current Java 11 and Poly/ML 5.8 with better scalability.
> To clarify this, here are the corresponding NEWS items:
> *** General ***
> * The font collection "Isabelle DejaVu" is systematically derived from
> the existing "DejaVu" fonts, with variants "Sans Mono", "Sans", "Serif"
> and styles "Normal", "Bold", "Italic/Oblique", "Bold-Italic/Oblique".
> The DejaVu base fonts are retricted to well-defined Unicode ranges and
> augmented by special Isabelle symbols, taken from the former
> "IsabelleText" font (which is no longer provided separately). The line
> metrics and overall rendering quality is closer to original DejaVu.
> INCOMPATIBILITY with display configuration expecting the old
> "IsabelleText" font: use e.g. "Isabelle DejaVu Sans Mono" instead.
> * The Isabelle fonts render "\<inverse>" properly as superscript "-1".
> *** Isabelle/jEdit Prover IDE ***
> * Fonts for the text area, gutter, GUI elements etc. use the "Isabelle
> DejaVu" collection by default, which provides uniform rendering quality
> with the usual Isabelle symbols. Line spacing no longer needs to be
> adjusted: properties for the old IsabelleText font had "Global Options /
> Text Area / Extra vertical line spacing (in pixels): -2", now it
> defaults to 0.
> * OpenJDK 11 has quite different font rendering, with better glyph
> shapes and improved sub-pixel anti-aliasing. In some situations results
> might be *worse* than Oracle Java 8, though.
> *** System ***
> * Update to OpenJDK 11: the current long-term support version of Java.
> (There is actually a small mistake above: the line-spacing default is
> now 1 instead of 0.)
> The change to OpenJDK 11 --- after Java 8 has been officially declared
> at "end-of-live" in Jan-2019 --- follows the normal routine of phasing
> out old technologies. Moreover, Java 8 had already shown its old age in
> Isabelle applications on high-end hardware: it is very inefficient on
> machines with many cores (20-80), and does not quite work with
> quasi-containers (e.g. Docker). Java 11 solves these and other problems.
> It even provides better font rendering, but that requires proper HiDPI
> displays (which are commonplace today).
> Nonetheless, very nostalgic users may still do their own private
> tinkering to return to Java 8 -- even with the old "IsabelleText" font
> with its various flaws. I will not support this, though. Big companies
> normally provide expensive support plans for continued support of legacy
> technologies, but I am not doing this.
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail (Mailman edition) and