Re: [isabelle] Difference between primrec and fun
> On 3 Oct 2019, at 10:57, Traytel Dmitriy <traytel at inf.ethz.ch> wrote:
> > I think it might be useful to cover primrec in the function definition tutorial.
> It is covered in the "datatypes" tutorial. It belongs there logically, because as Larry wrote, primrec is a relatively thin layer around the datatype's recursion combinator. But indeed a reference in the "functions" tutorial would make sense.
I'm not in charge of the "functions" tutorial, but a reference the other way does make sense. We already mentioned fun/function in the "datatypes" tutorial, but now I've just added (Isabelle/13d6b561b0ea) a paragraph capturing the essence of this thread.
This archive was generated by a fusion of
Pipermail (Mailman edition) and